5
2 To F.0 (JPM)
* 3.
燃
-
lanad,
Cont
7 - JUL 1932
Cart: (2 ) We
-71127/50. Geit:
Aust; an this.
Cons:
-52.
4
To ony Tat, cor.
218
indon
Ion 927 65752
4 a To O. A. 9. Tel 102-
46. O.A.G. Tel No. 173
5 Only. TEL. 194
16mm 927657 578
19/8
19/8
for
вышне
vire Consul.
Consul. should
be
of
Recommends that the request.
refused, takes reasons
I have always felt somewhat
distrustful
the Hong Kong attitude in this matter, and
reading the papers again after a lapse of time
I feel a stronger conviction that their fears are
probably greatly exaggerated. It is not explained
exactly in what ways the Chinese Consul coula
interfere with the local aministration. I
suspect that the Hong Kong authorities hain mina
the extruoruinary powers of interference possessed
by British consuls in China and they forget that a
Chinese consul in British territory would have no such powers, but would merely be in the position of
any other consul. As to political activity, it
is unlikely that he can do anything considerable
without its coming to the notice of the
Government, and we should then have a clear case
for insisting on his removal. It is true that
political aifficulties have been alleged in
connection
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.